This is just a just a random thought that came to me. I don’t feel one way or the other. But, I thought I would share to get some opinions.
The Phillies signed Zach Wheeler to a 5-year contract last off season. This would have been his age 30 season.
My question, whether we play a partial season or lose the whole season (and each outcome might produce differing opinions), do we still like the Wheeler signing? And, actually, this concern applies to all free agent signings across baseball, not just the Wheeler contract.
We expect there to be some lesser value when a long-term contract is signed. We might accept losing some value in year five and maybe even year four. But, if we lose a year of value at the front-end of a five-year contract, when the player is expected to be at the top of his game, would we have preferred to keep the #2 pick in the draft and the $500K international money?