It’s getting to be that time, time to take a look at how our prospects are doing this year, who’s stock is up, who’s stock is down, and who has fallen off the prospect map. I still haven’t decided how I want to start, but I may just go in reverse order of grades, so the players with the lowest grades will come first. I’ve spent the last 4 or 5 months tinkering with and developing a better evaluation system to assign a value or number to a prospect’s performance. As I’ve detailed in the past, not all .300 averages are the same, and 20 home runs isn’t just 20 home runs, that the context is important. When I roll out the grades, each player will have the following information given
Name – Age – Draft Year/Round – Position
2006 Batting Line – 2006 advanced stats (K rate, BB rate, XBH rate) – 2006 Index Score – Upside Score
2007 Batting Line – 2007 advanced stats (K rate, BB rate, XBH rate) – 2007 Index Score – Upside Score
The index score is the heart and soul of the formula I developed. It takes into account a player’s contact skill (batting average), his on base skills (OB%) and his power skill (slug%) and factors it into one number. The index score is a raw total. The upside score takes the raw numbers and then adjusts them for the park the player plays in, as well as the league he plays in, then factors in the age at that level. The Upside Score will either be higher or lower than the Index Score, and this will give a better indication as to the strength of the prospect. For example, a player who is 20 in High A is probably 1 year younger than the average age for legitimate prospects in High A. His Upside score would reflect this, and his score would be higher than his Index score. In another example, if a player is playing in a very hitter friendly park, in a league that favors scoring like the Cal League, his Upside score might be lower than his Index score, indicating he’s likely to see a regression in his overall numbers when moving to a more hitting neutral park/league.
This may seem a bit wordy now, but when you see an actual writeup, it will be much easier to understand. My plan is to do 4-5 prospect writeups a day, depending on the time I have. I’m still in the process of getting settled at my new abode, so it may be a few less than that to start.
Looking forward to yr take; if yr system is workable, you could draw attention from the bigs. Mr. James shouldn’t have a monopoly on this.
As previously mentioned, IMO the BEST time to evaluate what lurks in the system is at the season’ 2/3 mark.
Note that both Carrasco andOutman have had terrific games this past week. IMO, that is because of the prospect player learning process which, especially at the lower levels, is composed of learning a new pitch or modifying an older one plus the in and out up and down change of speeds and command of all of them is concentrated…which takes some doing for each player (particularly w pitchers, IMO) at each level.
IMO
LikeLike
My plan is to look now, and then look again at the end of the year. At the end of the year, we’ll then have two seasons worth of data to draw conclusions on and try to evaluate the worth of each prospect.
LikeLike
Is D’Arby Myers playing soon. Any idea how he was in extended spring training.
LikeLike
Carrasco with a gem tonight: CG, three-hit shutout, 7 Ks. I think he’s now 6-2, 2.84 on the year. For a 20 year-old in high-A, that works.
LikeLike
I waiting to see how you rate Costanzo, Cardenas, Happ, and Jaramillo.
I saw that Costanzo is leading in Home Runs and Games in AA, but has 18! errors.
And you said Happ is starting to have troubles with his arm and Mathieson
LikeLike
BTW–any info on that very interesting Hispanic SS who had been making waves earlier and likely to start at Clwtr Rookie Lg??
And, of course. D’arby…!
LikeLike